12 or 15 years ago a boss of mine gave me some investing advice. He suggested that as I was an early evaluator of technology, the things that I was choosing to buy for my company were likely the things that other people in similar roles at other companies would eventually choose to buy. If I chose a product that was produced by a publicly traded company whose stock price didn’t yet reflect these anticipated sales, it might be a good idea to buy the company’s stock. I heeded this advice successfully over the years.
Last night my wife and I were at a charity auction held to benefit my kindergartener’s elementary school. I think I observed an interesting social indicator. At these events, there’s both a silent auction and a live auction. For the silent auction, an item is placed on a table for viewing and if you’re interested, you fill in your bidder number into the next available bid slot. The bid sheet discloses the real value of the product (as you can only declare a charitable deduction for the amount in excess of the value of the item). Typically the minimum bid is somewhere around 25% of the value and often the winning bidder pays well above the real value (this is, after all, a charity event to help the school raise funds for playground equipment, field trips and teaching specialists). Most people don’t mind overpaying for a good cause, not to mention there’s plenty of wine flowing to get people into the spirit and loosen up their checkbooks.
The interesting phenomena I observed is that two items had no bidders – tickets to a Seattle Sonics game and a retail copy of Windows Vista. Hmm. What does that say? Nobody wants these items even at 25% of their real value! For the Sonics tickets, I think most of us have written the Sonics off. We’ve resigned to the idea that they’re moving to Oklahoma. Nobody bidding on Vista actually surprised me. The retail value was either $499 or $599 and not one person had bid at the minimum level of $50.
Here we are in Seattle, in Microsoft’s own stomping grounds, and no one wants Vista. Ouch. I think it’s time to sell my Microsoft stock.
2 Responses to Leading Indicators
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
Archives
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- March 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- October 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- September 2006




[...] blist sees bad tidings for Microsoft; seems that no one wanted Windows Vista at a charity auction held in [...]
I am guessing that the lack of bidders interested in Vista is less a reflection of public opinion regarding the new OS, and more a reflection of the adage “If it ain’t broke,…”. A very small percentage of users ever upgrade/replace their operating system. Most just stick with what came pre-installed on their computer (which, of course, is where MS dominates).
However, there has been some backlash and several manufacturers continue to offer XP – so maybe selling your stock isn’t such a bad idea ;-)
As for the Seattle Sonics, I still have hope that the parties involved will find a way to save our team.