Hmm. This is interesting. blist only launched in beta 2 weeks ago, but others are buying our trademarked name in Google AdWords. I’m not sure how to interpret it.

3 Responses to We’ve been AdWorded
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
Archives
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- March 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- October 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- September 2006




You can request to Google to consider blist a registered trademark and no one, except by blist, will be able to bid on that keyword. Since blist is quite a unique name it won’t be too hard to prove you own pretty much all definitions of it. Unless, blist means something else, then it might be harder.
I don’t know how you go about contacting Google, but I would search for “trademark infringement in adwords” and see what you come up with.
Google allows bidding on a trademark term, as far as the trademark term itself does not appear in the ad. This is true even if you inform Google that you hold the trademark for the term that being bid on.
It appears Caspio is keeping a close eye on Blist, given that they are bidding on ‘blist’ even before you are out of beta!
It must be the beginning of the Blist Bubble!
Just kidding. I’d interpret it as a positive unless you were trying to fly under the radar.
But I’d keep an eye on those guys.